Start your musical journey by discovering amazing songs and artists
Loading devices…
No output devices found. Use a supported browser (e.g. Chrome) for device selection.
Names may show as "Output 1", "Output 2" unless this site has microphone access.
My suggestion is to make a Top50 that only takes into account datas from the last 30 (60, 90?) days. So more new songs will be included (and then easily accessible for users).
As it is now, a new song beneficiates about 40 listenings, then quit the "last 100" and became very inaccessible... unless it reaches the top50. If the Top50 were monthly based, good new songs (I mean new songs with good Q) will have a better chance to be listened again.
... and the actual Top50 will stay as a kind of "All Times Top50"!
Imagine a radio Top50 where "Sympathy for the Devil" is still on top in 2007! That's what we have now. Hem... yes it's a bit exagerated, but that's what we will have in 2047 ;D
Originally posted by : SandwichGarnier
My suggestion is to make a Top50 that only takes into account datas from the last 30 (60, 90?) days. So more new songs will be included (and then easily accessible for users).
As it is now, a new song beneficiates about 40 listenings, then quit the "last 100" and became very inaccessible... unless it reaches the top50. If the Top50 were monthly based, good new songs (I mean new songs with good Q) will have a better chance to be listened again.
... and the actual Top50 will stay as a kind of "All Times Top50"!
Imagine a radio Top50 where "Sympathy for the Devil" is still on top in 2007! That's what we have now. Hem... yes it's a bit exagerated, but that's what we will have in 2047;D
True!! but im still wonderin why people want to change this top50... is it so important? and dont answer that i dont understand because im in this fukn top :) lol
of course there is some sense, but if you are fifth on the top 50, looking your song going up step by step over a lot of month, i think you dont say the same... :p
Even if i dont care so mush huh ^^
I was, until i see the benefits... damn, you are true of course, but since im on this top 5, all my tracks are listenend really more O_o
And i didnt cheat for, ive never send a pm for someone go listen to my song (simple, its not my favorite..and i dont really like this track finaly) so...before that i dont believe on this top 50, always the same thing are listened etc... but huh, i think 30 days is too short, i propose one year if something have to change, because they are real benefits to be in.
Even if you don't care of the fact of being in the top (my ass 8) ), the point of my thread is not there. If you post songs on ebel, you want those song to be listened to. And that is a way to give more chances for songs to be listened to.
When i say i dont care, what i mean is if i have to disapear of it, i dont cry ^^
you are true, this top 50 is a big brain break for those who want made it better. but you know, for a track will stabilize on a place, it take at less 6 month, really, so i repeat, 30 or §0 days is really too short.
Originally posted by : S-cape
maybe a top 50 artist could be good too...no ?
Oh, yes I think Zark has done a very good job and the Top50 is probably a very good mirror for the "all time prefered" music on ebel. No system will never tell if a music is good or bad.
And as a result of this (good work from zark), what I hear in the Top50 is averagely better than what I hear elsewhere on ebel.
My suggestion is just for adding a kind of rotation. Maybe with 3 or 4 month rotation if 1 or 2 is too fast...
Beta — data may be reset. Beta